All corrections
X September 18, 2026 at 08:26 AM

x.com/liamcoderx/status/2100555368791204199

1 correction found

1
Claim
It has absolutely nothing to do with physical attraction, getting older, or having kids.
Correction

That absolute statement is contradicted by relationship research. Older age and the transition to parenthood are both documented correlates of reduced sexual activity, and studies also link perceived sexual attractiveness with sexual frequency.

Full reasoning

The phrase "absolutely nothing to do with" is too strong and is contradicted by published research.

  • In a large U.S. General Social Survey analysis, older age was the factor most strongly associated with past-year sexlessness for both men and women.
  • In a national study of adults ages 57-85, researchers found a smooth decline in the likelihood of partnered sex with age for both men and women.
  • Research on couples transitioning to parenthood reports that sexual behaviors typically decline from pregnancy into the early postpartum period, so "having kids" is not irrelevant.
  • Research on marriage and body image found that wives' perceived sexual attractiveness was associated with more sexual frequency and higher sexual satisfaction, which cuts against the idea that physical attraction has "absolutely nothing" to do with sexual activity.

These studies do not mean age, attraction, or children explain every couple's sex life. But they do show the post's categorical claim is inaccurate: those factors are empirically related to sexual frequency and sexual inactivity.

4 sources
Model: OPENAI_GPT_5 Prompt: v1.16.0