en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jussie_Smollett
2 corrections found
He began his career as a child actor in 1991 debuting in The Mighty Ducks (1992).
This sentence misstates Smollett's debut. He appeared in the 1991 TV movie "A Little Piece of Heaven" before "The Mighty Ducks," which Disney lists as a 1992 release.
Full reasoning
The claim says Smollett began in 1991 by debuting in The Mighty Ducks (1992), but independent film listings show he was already acting in 1991.
- A Little Piece of Heaven was released as a TV movie on December 2, 1991, and Rotten Tomatoes' cast page lists Jussie Smollett as Salem Bordeaux.
- The Los Angeles Times review of that 1991 broadcast also describes one of the children in the movie as a "street-wise, jive-talking urchin (Jussie Smollett)."
- Disney's official page for The Mighty Ducks gives its release date as October 2, 1992.
So The Mighty Ducks was not his acting debut; it came after his 1991 appearance in A Little Piece of Heaven.
3 sources
- A Little Piece of Heaven | Cast and Crew | Rotten Tomatoes
"A Little Piece of Heaven: Full Cast & Crew 1991 ... Released (TV): Dec 2, 1991 ... Jussie Smollett Salem Bordeaux Actor"
- TV REVIEW : 'A Little Piece of Heaven': A Nice Little Slice of Capra - Los Angeles Times
The 1991 review says the brother brings home two children, "one a street-wise, jive-talking urchin (Jussie Smollett)."
- The Mighty Ducks | Disney Movies
Disney lists "The Mighty Ducks" with "Release Date: October 2, 1992."
The sentence was upheld on appeal in 2023, but the Illinois Supreme Court later reversed the conviction in 2024 on the basis that he had fulfilled the plea agreement made in 2019.
The 2019 deal was not a plea agreement. Illinois legal summaries describe it as a nonprosecution agreement that required no guilty plea or admission of wrongdoing.
Full reasoning
This sentence mischaracterizes the legal basis of the 2024 reversal. The Illinois Supreme Court did not say Smollett had fulfilled a plea agreement. The court's reasoning, as summarized by Illinois legal sources, was that he had completed a nonprosecution agreement with the State.
The Illinois State Bar Association's summary of People v. Smollett says the court found Smollett had entered into a nonprosecution agreement and had fully performed his part of that agreement. It specifically adds that the terms required dismissal of the original indictment in exchange for bond forfeiture and community service, with "no requirement that Smollett plead guilty or admit wrongdoing."
That directly contradicts calling the 2019 arrangement a "plea agreement." A plea agreement involves a plea; the sources here say there was no guilty plea requirement.
2 sources
- Quick Takes on Illinois Supreme Court Opinions Issued Thursday, November 21, 2024 | Illinois State Bar Association
"Today, the Supreme Court reversed outright, finding that Smollett had entered into a nonprosecution agreement ... The terms of that agreement were a complete dismissal ... with no requirement that Smollett plead guilty or admit wrongdoing."
- People v. Smollett :: 2023 :: Illinois Appellate Court, First District Decisions :: Illinois Case Law :: Illinois Law :: U.S. Law :: Justia
The opinion summary states: "Smollett did not enter into a plea agreement with the State, but a bilateral agreement took place, which bound the State, nonetheless."