en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Office_95

This infobox claim is incomplete in a way that changes the meaning: it implies Microsoft Office 95 only ran on Windows NT 3.51 or later. Microsoft’s published minimum system requirements for Microsoft Office version 7.0 for Windows 95 say the supported operating systems were "Microsoft Windows 95 operating system or Microsoft Windows NT Workstation operating system version 3.51 or later." That directly contradicts the article text, which omits Windows 95 entirely.

So the correct statement is that Office 95 supported Windows 95 and Windows NT Workstation 3.51 or later, not just Windows NT 3.51 or later.

The article’s system-requirements sentence says Office 95 requires "Windows NT 3.51 for typical use," but Microsoft’s own minimum-requirements document for Office 7.0 says otherwise. The operating-system requirement is either Windows 95 or Windows NT Workstation 3.51 or later.

Microsoft’s requirements also match the rest of the sentence’s hardware figures (386DX CPU, 8 MB RAM, 28 MB compact / 55 MB typical disk space), which makes the omission of Windows 95 stand out as an error in this specific clause rather than a different requirements table. The same Microsoft document says:

• "Microsoft Windows 95 operating system or Microsoft Windows NT Workstation operating system version 3.51 or later"

That directly contradicts the article’s narrower claim.

This claim combines the wrong RAM figure with the NT requirement. Microsoft’s published minimum requirements for Office 7.0 say:

• Windows 95: 8 MB of memory to run two programs
• Windows NT Workstation: 16 MB of memory to run two programs

So 8 MB was not the stated requirement for Windows NT 3.51. Microsoft’s own requirements document also says the software requirement was Windows 95 or Windows NT Workstation 3.51 or later, not NT alone.

That means the article’s phrasing is inaccurate on both counts: it attributes the 8 MB figure to the NT case, and it omits Windows 95 from the operating-system requirement.