www.lesswrong.com/posts/iyatrrJaHysuhrqXe/the-ballad-of-tigit
2 corrections found
for which Novartis paid $300 million in early 2021 for co-development rights
This gets the Novartis–BeiGene ociperlimab deal timing wrong. Novartis announced the $300 million upfront deal on December 20, 2021, not in early 2021.
Full reasoning
Novartis's own press release says the ociperlimab agreement was signed on December 20, 2021, and that "Novartis will make an upfront payment to BeiGene of USD 300 million." That directly contradicts the post's statement that Novartis paid $300 million in early 2021.
The same release also describes the transaction as an "option, collaboration and license agreement" under which Novartis would obtain broader development and commercialization rights if it exercised the option. So the post is not just early on timing; it also compresses the deal structure into a simpler "paid ... for co-development rights" description than the official announcement uses.
1 source
- Novartis strengthens immunotherapy pipeline with option, collaboration and license agreement with BeiGene for TIGIT inhibitor ociperlimab
Dec 20, 2021 ... Novartis announced today the signing of an option, collaboration and license agreement with BeiGene ... Under terms of the agreement, Novartis will make an upfront payment to BeiGene of USD 300 million.
tested on an ostensibly curable type of lung cancer,
SKYSCRAPER-01 was not conducted in a generally curable lung-cancer setting. Roche says the study enrolled patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic NSCLC, and NCI says current treatments do not cure NSCLC for most patients.
Full reasoning
The post describes SKYSCRAPER-01 as being "tested on an ostensibly curable type of lung cancer," but Roche's own study description says the trial enrolled patients with "first-line PD-L1-high locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer." That is an advanced-disease population, not the sort of setting usually described as curable.
The National Cancer Institute's patient guidance likewise states that "For most people with non-small cell lung cancer, current treatments do not cure the cancer." This directly conflicts with characterizing the SKYSCRAPER-01 population as an "ostensibly curable" type of lung cancer.
So the problem here is not a subtle framing dispute: the trial population was advanced unresectable/metastatic NSCLC, and authoritative cancer sources do not describe that setting as generally curable.
2 sources
- Roche reports interim results for phase III SKYSCRAPER-01 study in PD-L1-high metastatic non-small cell lung cancer
SKYSCRAPER-01 is a global phase III ... study evaluating tiragolumab plus Tecentriq versus Tecentriq alone in 534 patients with first-line PD-L1-high locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
- Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment (PDQ®) - NCI
For most people with non-small cell lung cancer, current treatments do not cure the cancer.