en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_%C3%89c%C3%B4ne_consecrations
3 corrections found
the bishops involved, the priests of the SSPX, and any laity who "formally adhere" to the group were excommunicated
The Vatican’s July 2, 2026 decree did not excommunicate all SSPX priests or all adherent laity. It named only six bishops and warned clerics and laity that adherence to the schism would incur excommunication.
Full reasoning
The official decree of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith dated 2 July 2026 specifically declares excommunication for Bishop Alfonso de Galarreta, the four newly consecrated bishops (Pascal Schreiber, Michael Goldade, Michel Poinsinet de Sivry, and Marc Hanappier), and Bishop Bernard Fellay as co-consecrator.
It does not declare that all priests of the SSPX or all laity who formally adhere to the group were excommunicated. Instead, the decree says that clerics and lay faithful are warned not to adhere to the schism, because they would incur excommunication if they do so. That is different from saying the Vatican had already declared all SSPX priests and adherent laity excommunicated.
This matches the Vatican’s earlier 13 May 2026 statement, which said that the upcoming episcopal ordinations would be a schismatic act and that formal adherence to the schism entails excommunication under Church law. Again, that is a warning about the consequence of adherence, not a blanket decree already excommunicating every SSPX priest or lay adherent.
2 sources
- Decreto del Dicastero per la Dottrina della Fede (2 luglio 2026)
The decree declares excommunication for Alfonso de Galarreta, Pascal Schreiber, Michael Goldade, Michel Poinsinet de Sivry, Marc Hanappier, and Bernard Fellay, then warns clerics and lay faithful not to adhere to the schism because they would incur latae sententiae excommunication.
- Statement of His Eminence Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández, Prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith
The statement says the act would constitute 'a schismatic act' and that 'formal adherence to the schism constitutes a grave offence against God and entails the excommunication established under Church law.'
The day after the consecration, the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith formally decreed the excommunication of the two bishop-consecrators, the newly ordained four bishops, 750 priests, and all lay Catholics with formal adherence to the SSPX.
The July 2, 2026 Vatican decree named six bishops, not 750 priests or all adherent laity. It warned clerics and lay faithful not to adhere to the schism, but did not formally excommunicate them en masse in that decree.
Full reasoning
The official 2 July 2026 decree from the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith is specific about who was declared excommunicated:
- Alfonso de Galarreta
- Pascal Schreiber
- Michael Goldade
- Michel Poinsinet de Sivry
- Marc Hanappier
- Bernard Fellay
The decree does not list or decree the excommunication of 750 priests. It also does not state that all lay Catholics with formal adherence to the SSPX were formally excommunicated in that decree. Instead, it says clerics and lay faithful are warned not to adhere to the schism, because they would incur excommunication if they do.
So the article overstates the scope of the Vatican decree. The decree named six bishops and issued a warning to others; it did not excommunicate the SSPX priesthood or all adherent laity en masse.
1 source
- Decreto del Dicastero per la Dottrina della Fede (2 luglio 2026)
The decree declares that Alfonso de Galarreta, Pascal Schreiber, Michael Goldade, Michel Poinsinet de Sivry, and Marc Hanappier incurred excommunication, and that Bernard Fellay also incurred excommunication. It then warns clerics and lay faithful not to adhere to the schism, because they would incur latae sententiae excommunication.
Under canon 1382 of the 1983 Code of Canon Law, a bishop who consecrates another bishop without a papal mandate, and the person who receives that consecration, incur automatic (latae sententiae) excommunication.
This penalty is no longer in canon 1382. In the current Code of Canon Law, unauthorized episcopal consecration is punished under canon 1387.
Full reasoning
This sentence cites the wrong canon number for the current law.
Under the revised Book VI of the Code of Canon Law, the provision stating that a bishop who consecrates someone a bishop without a pontifical mandate, and the person who receives that consecration, incur latae sententiae excommunication reserved to the Apostolic See, is canon 1387.
By contrast, in the current code canon 1382 concerns desecration of the consecrated Eucharistic species and sacrilegious consecration. The Vatican’s own 2 July 2026 decree on the SSPX consecrations explicitly cites canon 1387 for the unauthorized episcopal consecrations.
So while older discussions of the 1988 Écône consecrations often referred to canon 1382 under the pre-2021 numbering, this article’s present-tense statement about the law governing the 2026 consecrations uses an outdated canon reference.
2 sources
- Code of Canon Law - Book VI - Penal Sanctions in the Church (Cann. 1364-1399): Part II. Particular offences and the penalties established for them
Canon 1387 states: 'Both the Bishop who, without a pontifical mandate, consecrates a person a Bishop, and the one who receives the consecration from him, incur a latae sententiae excommunication reserved to the Apostolic See.' Canon 1382, by contrast, concerns sacrilegious treatment of the consecrated species.
- Decreto del Dicastero per la Dottrina della Fede (2 luglio 2026)
The decree says Alfonso de Galarreta incurred the penalties provided by 'can. 1387 e dal can. 1364 § 1 CIC 2021,' confirming that the applicable canon for the unauthorized consecrations is 1387.