All corrections
Wikipedia August 19, 2026 at 04:32 AM

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ergative%E2%80%93absolutive_alignment

3 corrections found

1
Claim
the subjects in Latin are marked with the nominative case marker "-us" for both transitive and intransitive verbs. Similarly, the object is always marked with the accusative marker "-um".
Correction

This overgeneralizes from one noun class. Latin does not mark all subjects with -us or all objects with -um; Latin nouns belong to multiple declensions with different nominative and accusative endings.

Full reasoning

The sentence takes the endings of the example nouns domin-us and serv-us and presents them as if they were the general Latin subject/object markers. But Latin nouns have five declensions with different case endings.

For example, standard declension tables show:

  • 1st declension nominative singular -a, accusative singular -am
  • 2nd declension masculine nominative singular -us, accusative singular -um
  • 3rd declension accusative singular often -em, with neuters having accusative identical to nominative

So -us and -um are not the universal Latin nominative and accusative markers; they are characteristic of some second-declension masculine examples. The article's claim is therefore factually incorrect as a statement about Latin in general.

2 sources
2
Claim
Such languages are said to operate with S/O syntactic pivot.
Correction

Ergative alignment does not by itself mean a language has an S/O syntactic pivot. Many ergative languages are only morphologically ergative and have accusative syntax with an S/A pivot.

Full reasoning

This sentence incorrectly treats ergative alignment as if it automatically implied an S/O syntactic pivot. In linguistic typology, those are different levels of analysis.

A language can be morphologically ergative—for example, by marking A differently from S and O in case or agreement—without being syntactically ergative. Standard references explicitly note that many morphologically ergative languages are syntactically accusative and use an S/A pivot, not an S/O pivot.

So the blanket statement that ergative languages "are said to operate with S/O syntactic pivot" is wrong. At most, some ergative languages do; many do not.

2 sources
3
Claim
Only transitive subjects have a case marking "-ŋgu".
Correction

Dyirbal transitive subjects are not marked only with -ŋgu. The ergative marker has several allomorphs in Dyirbal, including -ŋgu, -gu, -bu/-du/-ju, and -ru, depending on the noun stem.

Full reasoning

This sentence presents -ŋgu as if it were the sole transitive-subject marker in Dyirbal. That is too narrow and factually inaccurate.

Modern reference grammars describe Dyirbal ergative-instrumental marking as a set of allomorphs conditioned by the phonological shape of the nominal stem. In addition to -ŋgu, Dyirbal also uses forms such as -gu, homorganic stop + -u after nasals (-bu, -du, -ju), -ju after y, and -ru after liquids.

The examples in the article happen to use nouns that take -ŋgu, but the wording "Only transitive subjects have a case marking '-ŋgu'" wrongly implies that -ŋgu is the only ergative case form in the language.

2 sources
  • A New Grammar of Dyirbal

    Table 1.4 Case inflections on nominals: Ergative-instrumental is: -ŋgu after a disyllabic stem ending in a vowel; -gu after a longer stem ending in a vowel; a homorganic stop plus u after a nasal (-bu after m, -du after n, -ju after ñ); -ju after y; -ru after l, rr, or r.

  • UC Berkeley thesis excerpt on Dyirbal ergative allomorphy

    In Dyirbal, the ergative case is marked by -ŋgu or -gu, as shown ...

Model: OPENAI_GPT_5 Prompt: v1.16.0