www.lesswrong.com/posts/faGfpCwznWbe3AytD/why-do-you-need-the-story?recombeeReco...
1 correction found
which in itself is a vague term that nobody agrees on.
Medical sources do have a standard definition of inflammation. Major references consistently define it as the body's response to injury, infection, or other harmful stimuli.
Full reasoning
This overstates the uncertainty around the term inflammation. While there are debates about subtypes, mechanisms, biomarkers, and how inflammation contributes to particular diseases, mainstream medicine does not lack a shared definition altogether.
Authoritative medical references define inflammation in closely similar ways:
- MedlinePlus says: "The inflammatory response (inflammation) occurs when tissues are injured by bacteria, trauma, toxins, heat, or any other cause."
- NCBI StatPearls defines inflammation as "a set of changing responses to tissue injury primarily caused by factors such as toxic chemicals, environmental agents, trauma, overuse, or infection."
Those sources are describing the same core concept: a biological response to tissue injury or harmful stimuli. So the claim that inflammation is a term "nobody agrees on" is inaccurate.
2 sources
- Immune response: MedlinePlus Medical Encyclopedia
The inflammatory response (inflammation) occurs when tissues are injured by bacteria, trauma, toxins, heat, or any other cause.
- Pathology, Inflammation - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
Currently, inflammation is recognized as a set of changing responses to tissue injury primarily caused by factors such as toxic chemicals, environmental agents, trauma, overuse, or infection.