All corrections
Substack October 20, 2026 at 05:32 PM

www.owlposting.com/p/some-questions-and-answers-i-had

4 corrections found

1
Claim
Altos Labs launched in 2022 with $2 billion and backing from Jeff Bezos.
Correction

Altos Labs did launch in 2022, but the launch funding amount was widely reported as $3 billion, not $2 billion.

Full reasoning

The company’s own launch announcement says Altos Labs “launches with $3B fully committed from renowned company builders and investors.” That directly contradicts the post’s $2 billion figure. Multiple contemporaneous reports described the launch as a $3 billion debut as well. So the year is right, but the amount stated here is not.

2 sources
2
Claim
Retro Biosciences launched in 2023 with $180 million and backing from Sam Altman.
Correction

Retro Biosciences was publicly reported as launching in April 2022, not 2023.

Full reasoning

Contemporaneous coverage from April 6, 2022 reported that Retro Biosciences was launching with $180 million in funding. Later reporting also refers to that April 2022 launch and seed financing. So the funding figure is consistent with reports, but the launch year in the post is off by a year.

2 sources
3
Claim
NewLimit launched in 2023 with $40 million and backing from Brian Armstrong.
Correction

NewLimit was announced in December 2021; the $40 million figure refers to a later 2023 Series A, not the launch.

Full reasoning

NewLimit’s own announcement says the company’s formation was announced on December 11, 2021, and that it initially raised $105 million from the founders. In May 2023, NewLimit separately announced a $40 million Series A. So the post conflates a later funding round with the company’s launch.

2 sources
4
Claim
As a creature ages, the ratio of unmethylated CpG to methylated CpG sites goes up, reflecting a general loss of methylation in aging. This is also known as Horvarth's Clock.
Correction

Horvath’s epigenetic clock is not a simple genome-wide unmethylated:methylated CpG ratio. It is a weighted predictor built from 353 specific CpG sites, some of which gain methylation with age and some of which lose it.

Full reasoning

This description collapses two different ideas into one and ends up misdescribing Horvath’s clock. Reviews of the 2013 Horvath clock explain that it is a multi-tissue age predictor based on 353 specific CpG sites, not a single global ratio of unmethylated to methylated CpGs. Those same reviews note that among the 353 sites, some become hypermethylated with age and others hypomethylated with age. More broadly, the aging methylome is not just a monotonic global loss of methylation: age-related changes include both hypomethylation and hypermethylation in different genomic contexts. So calling a general rise in the unmethylated:methylated CpG ratio “Horvath’s Clock” is inaccurate.

2 sources
Model: OPENAI_GPT_5 Prompt: v1.16.0