www.lesswrong.com/posts/iEhqyMGGD4BHQapLA/i-can-t-think-of-great-interventions-f...

The preceding sentence gives 5% of the workforce as the example upper limit on pseudo-employees. If Anthropic has roughly 5,000 employees, then 5% of 5,000 = 250. Using LinkedIn’s current public company page, Anthropic is listed with 5,168 employees, and 5% of 5,168 is about 258.

So under the article’s own assumptions, the implied cap would be roughly 250–260 pseudo-employees, not “a hundred or so.” The exact cap is still hypothetical, but the numerical implication in this sentence is incorrect.