All corrections
Wikipedia July 19, 2026 at 08:13 PM

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Malek

3 corrections found

1
Claim
On August 12, 2003, the SEC filed a civil fraud lawsuit against former Connecticut state Senate Democratic Majority Leader William DiBella for participating in a fraudulent scheme to invest $75 million of the state pension funds with Malek's firm, Thayer Capital Partners.
Correction

The SEC's civil fraud action against William DiBella was filed on August 12, 2004, not August 12, 2003.

Full reasoning

The year in this sentence is off by one.

Official SEC materials identify the DiBella civil fraud action as a 2004 case:

  • The SEC's later litigation release about the DiBella case says: "For further information, see Litigation Release Number 18829 (August 12, 2004)."
  • The SEC's 2004 enforcement overview likewise states: "On August 12, 2004, the Commission filed a civil fraud action against William A. DiBella..."

So the filing date was August 12, 2004, not August 12, 2003.

2 sources
  • SEC.gov | William A. DiBella, et al.

    "For further information, see Litigation Release Number 18829 (August 12, 2004) and Administrative Proceeding Release Number 33-8457 (August 12, 2004)."

  • SEC Enforcement Overview

    "On August 12, 2004, the Commission filed a civil fraud action against William A. DiBella ..."

2
Claim
On May 18, 2007, Thayer was found in negligence of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and was ultimately forced to pay a civil penalty of $150,000, while Malek personally paid a fine of $100,000 for his role in the affair.
Correction

May 18, 2007 was the date a jury found William DiBella liable. Thayer and Malek had already settled with the SEC in 2004, when the censure and penalties were imposed.

Full reasoning

This sentence conflates two different events.

According to the SEC:

  1. May 18, 2007 was when a federal jury found William DiBella and his consulting firm liable.
  2. Thayer and Malek were not first "found" liable on that date. The SEC says it had previously brought and settled charges against Thayer, Malek, and related entities.
  3. The actual SEC administrative order against Thayer and Malek is dated August 12, 2004, and that is the order that censured them and imposed the $150,000 penalty on Thayer and $100,000 penalty on Malek.

So the article is wrong to say that on May 18, 2007 Thayer was found negligent and then forced to pay those penalties. The 2007 verdict concerned DiBella; the Thayer/Malek settlement and penalties were imposed in 2004.

2 sources
3
Claim
The scheme moved much of the Connecticut State Retirement and Trust Fund into high-risk, long term, non-liquid private equity funds (such as Thayer's).
Correction

The transaction involved $75 million, while Connecticut's retirement and trust funds had about $19.8 billion under management in 1999. That was well under 1% of the fund, so it did not move "much" of it.

Full reasoning

This sentence is quantitatively wrong.

The SEC says the investment at issue was $75 million. But Connecticut's own 1999 Treasurer annual report says the state's Retirement Plans and Trust Funds had grown to $19.8 billion under management by June 30, 1999.

That means the Thayer investment represented roughly 0.38% of the total fund assets ($75 million out of $19.8 billion). A sub-1% allocation is not accurately described as "much of" the Connecticut State Retirement and Trust Fund.

Whatever one thinks about the prudence of the investment, the article's wording massively overstates its scale.

2 sources
Model: OPENAI_GPT_5 Prompt: v1.16.0