All corrections
Wikipedia March 16, 2026 at 01:06 AM

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymarket

4 corrections found

1
Claim
Polymarket blocked access to United States customers from 2022 to December 2, 2025
Correction

This end date is wrong. Reuters reported that the CFTC approved Polymarket’s U.S. relaunch on September 3, 2025, and a CFTC filing shows Polymarket US was designated in July 2025.

Full reasoning

The article says U.S. customers were blocked until December 2, 2025, but contemporaneous reporting and CFTC records show Polymarket’s U.S. return happened earlier.

  • A Reuters report published September 3, 2025 says the CFTC approved Polymarket to relaunch in the United States on that date, "more than three years after its exit."
  • A CFTC industry filing shows QCX LLC d/b/a Polymarket US had already been designated on July 9, 2025.

So the statement that U.S. access remained blocked until December 2, 2025 is incorrect; the documented relaunch/approval came months earlier.

2 sources
2
Claim
In October 2025, Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) invested $2 billion in Polymarket, bringing the company's valuation to $9 billion.
Correction

This overstates the deal as a completed $2 billion investment. Contemporary reports and ICE’s announcement said ICE agreed to invest up to $2 billion, with Polymarket valued at about $8 billion pre-investment.

Full reasoning

This sentence misstates the October 2025 ICE deal.

  • ICE’s own announcement said it would invest up to $2 billion in Polymarket, not that it had already invested a completed $2 billion in October 2025.
  • The same announcement said that amount reflected a valuation of approximately $8 billion pre-investment.
  • AP’s contemporaneous coverage likewise described the transaction as "to invest up to $2 billion".

So the sentence is incorrect in presenting the transaction as a completed $2 billion investment in October 2025, and it does not match the valuation language used in the primary announcement.

2 sources
3
Claim
On November 14, 2025, the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) indicated that Russian forces had advanced into downtown Myrnohrad, despite no evidence to support such an advance.
Correction

This date and characterization are wrong. Reporting and ISW’s own statement say the problematic map edit was an unauthorized overnight edit on November 15–16, not an official ISW indication on November 14.

Full reasoning

The article presents this as if ISW itself indicated on November 14, 2025 that Russian forces had advanced into downtown Myrnohrad. But the reporting on the incident says otherwise.

  • NPR’s interview with 404 Media says that on November 15, just before 6 a.m., someone with access to ISW’s map edited it to make it appear Russia had advanced into the city.
  • A later report quoting ISW’s own public statement says the problem was an "unauthorized and unapproved edit" made "on the night of November 15-16 EST" and removed before the normal workflow on November 16.

So this was not an official ISW indication on November 14. It was described as an unauthorized map edit that occurred later, overnight on November 15–16.

2 sources
4
Claim
Kalshi – U.S. based online prediction market, exclusive to U.S. users
Correction

This is outdated. Kalshi’s own help documentation says the platform is now accessible internationally, not exclusive to U.S. users.

Full reasoning

Kalshi is not currently limited to U.S. users.

Kalshi’s official Help Center says:

  • "Kalshi is accessible internationally" and that some international jurisdictions remain restricted.
  • Its international eligibility page also says "Kalshi is accessible from many countries."

So describing Kalshi as "exclusive to U.S. users" is inaccurate.

2 sources
Model: OPENAI_GPT_5 Prompt: v1.16.0