x.com/iron_redux/status/2083359008526659857
1 correction found
Gromov's conjecture "Every property that's true for all groups is trivial" has just been vindicated!!!
The new paper does not vindicate this claim. It presents the idea as a Gromov aphorism about finitely generated groups and explicitly critiques it by discussing counterexamples.
Full reasoning
The paper this post appears to be referring to is Tom Hutchcroft's 2026 article Are there non-trivial theorems about all finitely generated groups? The official abstract says the paper discusses "potential counterexamples" to the meta-mathematical question in its title, not a proof or vindication of the Gromov aphorism. In the paper itself, Hutchcroft says the goal is a "light-hearted" critique of the aphorism and then gives examples of non-trivial properties that hold for all finitely generated groups.
So the post reverses the paper's actual thrust: the paper is not a vindication that every universally true group property is trivial, but an exploration of why that slogan is too crude and has counterexamples. The post also overstates the slogan itself: the paper formulates the aphorism for finitely generated groups, not for all groups.
2 sources
- Are there non-trivial theorems about all finitely generated groups? | CaltechAUTHORS
Abstract: "We discuss several interpretations and potential counterexamples to the meta-mathematical question in the title of the paper".
- Are there non-trivial theorems about all finitely generated groups? (PDF)
The paper says its goal is a "light-hearted ... critique" of the aphorism, formulated as: "If a property is satisfied by all finitely generated groups, then it must be satisfied for trivial reasons."