en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_card

The statement says V visas are "no longer available," but official U.S. government sources say the V nonimmigrant category still exists and remains available for certain spouses and children of lawful permanent residents if they meet the statutory criteria tied to petitions filed on or before December 21, 2000.

The U.S. Department of State's current V-visa page explains that the LIFE Act "created a nonimmigrant visa category, the V visa, with specific provisions for certain spouses and children of U.S. lawful permanent residents," and lists present eligibility requirements, including that the underlying Form I-130 must have been filed on or before December 21, 2000. It adds that embassies and consulates "have not issued any V visas for the past several years" because those old priority dates have generally become current—not because the category ceased to exist.

USCIS likewise maintains a current page for "V Nonimmigrant Visas," which describes who may still qualify for V status. So the accurate description is that V visas are extremely limited and rarely, if ever, issued now—not that they are categorically unavailable.

Under the Child Citizenship Act (INA §320), having at least one U.S. citizen parent is only one of several requirements for automatic acquisition of citizenship after birth. USCIS says the child must also be under 18, be a lawful permanent resident, and reside in the United States in the legal and physical custody of the U.S. citizen parent.

So the article's statement is incorrect because it presents one requirement as if it were sufficient by itself. Many minors with a U.S. citizen parent do not automatically become citizens unless the rest of the statutory conditions are met.

USCIS states that to petition for a sibling, the petitioner and sibling must show that they have at least one common parent. USCIS specifically provides documentation rules for half-siblings, including paternal half-siblings, which directly contradicts the claim that siblings "must have the same parents."

So the article's statement is too restrictive and false: full siblings are not required; qualifying sibling relationships can include half-siblings and certain step- or adoptive-sibling relationships recognized under immigration law.

The sentence says that, aside from immediate relatives of U.S. citizens, an applicant "must" be in legal status at filing. USCIS policy says that is not universally true.

USCIS explains that most applicants must maintain status until filing, except immediate relatives and certain special immigrants. USCIS also separately explains that some employment-based applicants can still adjust under INA 245(k) despite specified status violations, so long as they qualify for that exemption.

Because official USCIS guidance recognizes multiple exceptions beyond immediate relatives, the article's blanket statement is inaccurate.

This wording overstates what the U.S. government officially announced. The State Department's December 23, 2025 guidance says it "paused all visa issuances to diversity immigrant visa applicants". The same guidance says applicants may still submit visa applications and attend interviews, but no visas will be issued during the pause.

State Department materials also continued to discuss the DV-2027 program after that point, including changes to the upcoming entry period and confirming that the DV-2027 visa-application period would remain October 1, 2026 to September 30, 2027. That contradicts the article's claim that the entire "Green Card Lottery program" was suspended.

The article gives fixed thresholds of $600,000 for the mark-to-market gain exclusion and $139,000 for the average annual net income tax liability test. Current IRS guidance shows those figures are no longer correct.

The IRS states that for calendar year 2025, the expatriation-tax exclusion amount is $890,000, not $600,000. The IRS also states that the covered-expatriate tax-liability threshold is $206,000 for 2025 and $211,000 for 2026, not $139,000.

The net-worth test of more than $2 million is still part of the covered-expatriate definition, but the article's quoted dollar amounts for the other two thresholds are outdated and therefore inaccurate as written.

Official USCIS and State Department guidance says not all petitioners/intending immigrants need Form I-864. USCIS lists several exemptions, including intending immigrants who can be credited with 40 qualifying quarters of work, certain self-petitioning widow(er)s, certain self-petitioning battered spouses or children, and some children who will automatically become U.S. citizens upon admission. Those applicants may be exempt and may use Form I-864W instead.

Because the article says all petitioners must provide Form I-864, it is factually overbroad and wrong.

USCIS states that the requirement to carry evidence of registration at all times applies to permanent residents age 18 or older. The article's sentence says every green-card holder must carry the card at all times, which is broader than the law as USCIS describes it.

A more accurate statement would be that permanent residents 18 and older are required to carry valid proof of permanent resident status in their personal possession.