en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistemic_humility

The post gives the title as Heterosyncracies, but the publisher’s official page for the 2005 book gives the title as Heterosyncrasies: Female Sexuality When Normal Wasn't. Because the rest of the bibliographic details (author and year) match, this is a title error rather than a different work.

The post refers to Jack Halberstram, but the scholar’s official biography gives the name as Jack Halberstam. This is a name error in the article text.

The post says Clinton argued that sex only meant heterosexual penile-vaginal intercourse. But in Clinton’s August 1998 grand jury testimony, he was directly asked whether his definition of “sexual relationship” was “intercourse only,” and he answered: “No, not necessarily intercourse only, but it would include intercourse.”

He also stated that, under the definition he was discussing, directly touching breasts and touching genitalia could be covered. The dispute in the testimony was narrower: Clinton argued that oral sex performed on the deponent was not covered by the specific definition of “sexual relations” at issue. That is different from claiming that sex only refers to heterosexual penile-vaginal intercourse.

So the article’s wording is inaccurate because it turns a narrower legal/semantic argument into a broader claim Clinton explicitly did not make in that testimony.