www.lesswrong.com/posts/n6Rsb2jDpYSfzsbns/consider-donating-to-ai-safety-champio...

SB 53 does not limit enforcement to situations where a company lies.

California's official bill text says a large frontier developer is subject to civil penalties if it fails to publish or transmit a required compliant document, makes a prohibited false statement, fails to report an incident, or fails to comply with its own frontier AI framework. The Governor's signing announcement similarly summarizes the law as creating "a civil penalty for noncompliance".

So lying is only one enforcement trigger under SB 53. A company can also face penalties for noncompliance even without making a false statement—for example, by failing to publish a required framework/transparency report or by failing to report a critical safety incident.

The statement says any U.S. citizen or permanent resident can donate, but federal election law has source prohibitions that exclude some people even if they are U.S. citizens or green-card holders.

The Federal Election Commission's guidance says that while individuals may contribute subject to limits, campaigns are prohibited from accepting contributions from certain sources, including federal government contractors. So citizenship or permanent-resident status alone is not sufficient to make someone eligible to donate to a federal candidate.

A more accurate version would be that U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents generally may contribute to federal candidates, unless another prohibition applies (for example, the federal-contractor ban).