en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_DeepMind
4 corrections found
The company was afterwards renamed Google DeepMind and kept that name for about two years.
This is incorrect: Google says the combined unit called “Google DeepMind” was created in April 2023, not shortly after the 2014 acquisition.
Full reasoning
Google’s own 2023 announcement says “DeepMind and the Brain team from Google Research will be joining forces as a single, focused unit called Google DeepMind” on April 20, 2023. That means the name Google DeepMind was adopted for the merged AI unit in 2023, not for “about two years” after the 2014 acquisition.
Contemporary Google material from 2016 also still refers to the company simply as DeepMind: the AlphaGo announcement is authored by Demis Hassabis as “CEO and Co-Founder, DeepMind.” That directly contradicts the claim that the company had already been renamed “Google DeepMind” after the acquisition and used that name for roughly two years.
So the article’s timeline is wrong: after Google acquired DeepMind in 2014, the company continued to be referred to publicly as DeepMind; Google DeepMind was announced later, in April 2023.
2 sources
- Announcing Google DeepMind - Google DeepMind
April 20, 2023 ... “DeepMind and the Brain team from Google Research will be joining forces as a single, focused unit called Google DeepMind.”
- AlphaGo: using machine learning to master the ancient game of Go
Jan 27, 2016 ... Demis Hassabis, “CEO and Co-Founder, DeepMind.”
On 13 November 2018, DeepMind announced that its health division and the Streams app would be absorbed into Google Health.
This misstates both the date and the announcement. In November 2018, DeepMind said the team behind Streams would join Google; the official move into Google Health was announced on September 18, 2019.
Full reasoning
DeepMind’s own November 13, 2018 post does not say that its health division was being absorbed into Google Health. It says “the team behind Streams ... will be joining Google.” The same page includes an update clarifying the later milestone: “On September 18 2019, we confirmed DeepMind Health had joined the Google Health family.”
Google’s September 18, 2019 post then states that “the team is excited to officially join the Google Health family.”
So this Wikipedia sentence is incorrect in two ways:
- November 13, 2018 was not the date DeepMind said it was joining Google Health specifically.
- The official Google Health integration was announced later, on September 18, 2019.
2 sources
- Scaling Streams with Google - Google DeepMind
November 13, 2018 ... “the team behind Streams ... will be joining Google.” Note: “On September 18 2019, we confirmed DeepMind Health had joined the Google Health family.”
- DeepMind's health team joins Google Health
Sep 18, 2019 ... “the team is excited to officially join the Google Health family.”
the Confidentiality Advisory Group of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
This identifies the wrong regulator. The Confidentiality Advisory Group (CAG) is part of the Health Research Authority, not the MHRA.
Full reasoning
The Health Research Authority’s own description says the Confidentiality Advisory Group (CAG) is an independent body that provides advice to the HRA for research uses and to the Secretary of State for Health for non-research uses. HRA guidance also explicitly says “CAG – The Confidentiality Advisory Group is an independent body of the HRA” and separately defines the MHRA as the regulator for medicines and medical devices.
So describing CAG as being “of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency” is factually wrong: CAG belongs to the Health Research Authority (HRA), not the MHRA.
2 sources
- Confidentiality Advisory Group - Health Research Authority
“The Confidentiality Advisory Group (CAG) is an independent body ... providing advice to us, the Health Research Authority (HRA) for research uses.”
- Directory - Health Research Authority
“CAG - The Confidentiality Advisory Group is an independent body of the HRA ...” and separately “MHRA - The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency regulates medicine, medical devices, and blood components in the UK.”
Google DeepMind developed an AI-based weather prediction system called Weather Lab, which significantly improved tropical cyclone forecasting.
This confuses the product with the model. Google says Weather Lab is an interactive website/research tool for sharing AI weather models; the cyclone forecasting model is a separate experimental model featured inside Weather Lab.
Full reasoning
Google’s own announcement does not describe Weather Lab as the weather prediction model itself. It says “Weather Lab is an interactive website for sharing Google’s AI weather models” and that Google is “launching Weather Lab, an interactive website for sharing our artificial intelligence (AI) weather models.”
The accompanying Google DeepMind post makes the distinction explicit: “Weather Lab features our latest experimental AI-based tropical cyclone model, based on stochastic neural networks.” It also says “Weather Lab is a research tool.”
So the article mixes up two different things:
- Weather Lab = the website / research tool / platform
- the experimental tropical cyclone model = the AI forecasting model hosted within Weather Lab
That makes the sentence inaccurate as written.
2 sources
- Google's newest experimental AI is making cyclone predictions
“Weather Lab is an interactive website for sharing Google's AI weather models.”
- How we're supporting better tropical cyclone prediction with AI - Google DeepMind
“Today, Google DeepMind and Google Research are launching Weather Lab, an interactive website for sharing our artificial intelligence (AI) weather models.” It also says: “Weather Lab features our latest experimental AI-based tropical cyclone model, based on stochastic neural networks.”