x.com/BrandonLuuMD/status/2046899019448828333

The cited study does not report a result that “0 of 160 women preferred weaker-looking men.”

What the paper actually says is:

• Raters were assigned to rate photos for either physical attractiveness or physical strength.
• Attractiveness was rated on a 1–7 scale (“very unattractive” to “very attractive”), not by asking each woman to choose between a stronger-looking and weaker-looking man.
• The authors then analyzed average ratings across raters for each photographed man: “We computed the average ratings of attractiveness and strength for each photographed subject. We then regressed the average rating for strength against the average rating for attractiveness.”
• The paper also says that after checking for sex differences, male and female raters were combined in later analyses: “In future analyses, male and female raters were always combined.”

So the paper supports a strong aggregate correlation between looking strong and being rated attractive, but it does not report a published finding that zero out of 160 women individually preferred weaker-looking men. That claim misstates both the study design and the reported result.