All corrections
Substack May 4, 2026 at 05:40 AM

carlhendrick.substack.com/p/the-problem-with-banning-social-media

2 corrections found

1
Claim
Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, and seven other major platforms.
Correction

Australia’s age-restriction list was 10 major platforms in total, not 11. After the four named here, there were six others, not seven.

Full reasoning

The official Australian eSafety list published ahead of the 10 December 2025 start date named 10 age-restricted services, not 11. The list was: Facebook, Instagram, Kick, Reddit, Snapchat, Threads, TikTok, Twitch, X, and YouTube. The University of Chicago working paper cited in the article says the same thing: the law applied to “ten major social platforms.”

So the article’s wording is off by one. If four platforms are named explicitly (Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok), there were six other major platforms on the official list, not seven.

2 sources
2
Claim
91 percent of unbanned 16–18-year-olds in Australia
Correction

The cited working paper gives 87.1% for Australian 16–18-year-olds as a group. The 91% figure is only for 18-year-olds, not the full 16–18 cohort.

Full reasoning

This sentence misstates the paper’s own number. The working paper reports that past-week use was 87.1% among unbanned Australian 16–18-year-olds. It then breaks that group down by age: 81% at age 16, 87% at age 17, and 91% at age 18.

So 91% is not the figure for Australian 16–18-year-olds overall; it is the figure for 18-year-olds alone. The paper’s stated average for the whole 16–18 group is 87.1%.

2 sources
Model: OPENAI_GPT_5 Prompt: v1.16.0