All corrections
LessWrong March 13, 2026 at 08:29 PM

www.lesswrong.com/posts/MoF426vqQFmuwwnFf/bigger-livers

4 corrections found

1
Claim
a viral gene therapy in mice that induced follistatin overexpression in the liver resulted in 40% bigger livers, with no apparent signs of impaired liver function.
Correction

The cited follistatin gene-therapy study was done in adult rats, not mice. Its abstract says adenoviral follistatin enlarged the livers of adult male rats to 146% of control without significant dysfunction.

Full reasoning

The species is misstated here.

The cited paper is titled "Adenovirus-mediated overexpression of follistatin enlarges intact liver of adult rats". In the PubMed abstract, the authors write that intraperitoneal injection of the adenoviral vector caused significant liver growth "in intact liver of adult male rats" 12 days after treatment, without significant dysfunctions.

So the underlying result is about rats, not mice. The approximate size increase is in the same ballpark as the post says (the paper reports 146% of control, i.e. about a 46% increase), but the animal species in the post is incorrect.

1 source
2
Claim
they also have liver cancers
Correction

The cited Yap/Taz knockout paper reported liver adenomas, not liver cancers. It explicitly says the mice did not have hepatocellular carcinoma or cholangiocarcinoma.

Full reasoning

This overstates what the cited mouse study found.

In the full text of Lu, Finegold, and Johnson (2018), the authors say that one-year-old Yap/Taz-mutant mice developed liver adenomas. They then immediately add: "We did not observe other liver tumors in these mice at 1 year of age, including hepatocellular carcinoma or cholangiocarcinoma."

That directly contradicts the wording "liver cancers". An adenoma is not the same thing as a carcinoma; NCBI's MedGen entry notes that adenomas are neoplasms whose vast majority are benign.

So the paper supports a claim that these mice developed adenomas/tumors, but not that they had liver cancers.

2 sources
3
Claim
obese people don’t have bigger livers or kidneys.
Correction

This is too categorical: human studies do report larger kidneys in obesity, and studies also report larger liver volumes in obese patients. So big livers/kidneys are not unique to athletes.

Full reasoning

The claim says obese people do not have bigger livers or kidneys, but published human studies report the opposite.

For kidneys, a CT study in potential live kidney donors found that increased body mass index was associated with increased total kidney volume. The association persisted after adjustment for age, sex, race, hypertension, and diabetes.

For livers, human studies also report larger liver volume in obese patients. In one study of patients undergoing liver resection, obese patients had a trend toward larger liver size and the authors concluded that "obese patients had larger ... livers." Another study comparing NAFLD patients with healthy controls found significantly larger livers in the patient group and identified BMI as an independent predictor of liver size.

These studies do not imply that every obese person will have enlarged organs, but they do contradict the post's blanket statement that obese people don't have bigger livers or kidneys.

3 sources
4
Claim
IL-6 will make a rat’s liver double in size
Correction

The cited IL-6 hepatomegaly paper was done in mice, not rats. Its title and abstract both describe systemic IL-6 administration causing liver enlargement in nude mice.

Full reasoning

The animal species is wrong here.

The cited study is "Massive liver growth in mice induced by systemic interleukin 6 administration". Its abstract states that systemic IL-6 administration in nude mice caused dramatic hepatomegaly, with liver mass increasing to 2 to 3 times normal.

So the underlying finding is about mice, not rats.

1 source
Model: OPENAI_GPT_5 Prompt: v1.16.0