en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibn_Saud
4 corrections found
The Treaty of Darin remained in effect until superseded by the Jeddah conference of 1927 and the Dammam conference of 1952
This is chronologically wrong. The Treaty of Darin was superseded by the 1927 Treaty of Jeddah; the 1952 Dammam conference was a separate boundary conference, not the act that replaced Darin.
Full reasoning
The claim incorrectly treats the 1952 Dammam conference as part of the process that superseded the Treaty of Darin. Contemporary and reference sources show that the key replacement happened in 1927, when the Treaty of Jeddah recognized Saudi independence and replaced the earlier British-protection arrangement. By contrast, the Dammam conference of 1952 concerned boundary problems between Saudi Arabia and the shaikhdoms of Qatar and Abu Dhabi. It was not the instrument that superseded the Treaty of Darin.
So the error is not just wording: it changes the legal timeline by implying Darin remained operative until 1952, when the available sources show its supersession occurred in 1927.
2 sources
- Foreign Relations of the United States, 1952–1954, Volume IX, Part 2, Document 1466 - Office of the Historian
A conference on boundary problems between Saudi Arabia and the Shaikhdoms of Qatar and Abu Dhabi, represented by the British, opened at Damman on January 28, 1952.
- Treaty of Jeddah | United Kingdom-Saudi Arabia [1927] | Britannica
In the 1927 Treaty of Jeddah the British recognized Saudi sovereignty over the Hejaz and Najd regions... the British fully acknowledged Saudi independence.
It was only his son, King Faisal, who abolished slavery in Saudi Arabia in 1967.
Saudi slavery was abolished in 1962, not 1967, and the emancipation decree was issued during King Saud's reign, with Prince Faisal announcing it as crown prince and prime minister.
Full reasoning
This sentence gets both the date and the attribution wrong.
The Saudi royal record states that King Abdulaziz banned the trade in enslaved people in 1936, but that the explicit Decree of Emancipation was issued on 6 November 1962 during the reign of King Saud. The same source explains that Prince Faisal announced the reform in his ministerial statement as crown prince, prime minister, and foreign minister.
A U.S. State Department historical document from November 1962 independently confirms that abolishing slavery was one of the reforms being pushed at that time. That means the article's claim that slavery was abolished in 1967 by King Faisal is incorrect.
2 sources
- Slavery During the Reign of King Saud - The King Saud Library
In 1355 AH / 1936 CE, King Abdulaziz ordered the prohibition of this trade... on 9 Jumada II 1382 AH / 6 November 1962 CE, the Decree of Emancipation was issued. Prince Faisal affirmed: 'This is among the measures that the Government of His Majesty the King wishes to implement.'
- Foreign Relations of the United States, 1961–1963, Volume XVIII, Document 91 - Office of the Historian
Reform measures mentioned in telegram 321 from Jidda, October 31, included ... abolish slavery.
by sending T. E. Lawrence to him in 1915.
Lawrence was not sent to the Hejaz in 1915. Sources place his mission there in October 1916, after the Arab Revolt had already begun.
Full reasoning
The year here is wrong. Reliable accounts of T. E. Lawrence's role in the Arab Revolt place his arrival in the Hejaz in October 1916, not 1915.
PBS's historical feature on the revolt states that Ronald Storrs went to Jeddah in October 1916 and took Lawrence with him; Lawrence then remained in the Hejaz. The Imperial War Museums biography likewise says that in October 1916 Lawrence was sent to the Hejaz to assist the Arab Revolt.
So the article's wording incorrectly moves Lawrence's mission to Hussein bin Ali back by about a year.
2 sources
- Lawrence of Arabia . Emerging Middle East . The Revolt stalls | PBS
Storrs decided to go to Jeddah in October 1916 to see for himself. He took a young intelligence officer with him for company - T.E. Lawrence... Lawrence remained in the Hejaz.
- Who Was Lawrence Of Arabia? - Imperial War Museums
In October 1916 he was sent to Hejaz, an area in the west of present-day Saudi Arabia, to assist the Arab Revolt.
which lasted for three days
The Roosevelt–Ibn Saud meeting on USS Quincy was on February 14, 1945, not a three-day meeting.
Full reasoning
The official U.S. diplomatic record does not support the claim that Roosevelt's meeting with Ibn Saud lasted three days.
The State Department's Foreign Relations of the United States volume groups several leaders' conversations at Great Bitter Lake on February 13–14, 1945, but the specific memorandum for the Roosevelt–Ibn Saud conversation is dated February 14, 1945, aboard the USS Quincy. In other words, the broader visit window spanned February 13–14, but the actual Roosevelt–Ibn Saud meeting recorded in the official memorandum was on one day, not three.
That makes the article's "lasted for three days" wording incorrect.
2 sources
- Foreign Relations of the United States, Diplomatic Papers, 1945, The Near East and Africa, Volume VIII - Office of the Historian
Conversations between President Roosevelt and King Farouk of Egypt, Emperor Haile Selassie of Ethiopia, and King Abdul Aziz al-Saud of Saudi Arabia, at Great Bitter Lake, Egypt, on February 13-14, 1945.
- Memorandum of Conversation Between the King of Saudi Arabia (Abdul Aziz Al Saud) and President Roosevelt, February 14, 1945, Aboard the U.S.S. 'Quincy' - Office of the Historian
Memorandum of Conversation Between the King of Saudi Arabia (Abdul Aziz Al Saud) and President Roosevelt, February 14, 1945, Aboard the U.S.S. 'Quincy'.