All corrections
Wikipedia July 28, 2026 at 02:40 PM

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wrath_of_Homer

2 corrections found

1
Claim
German scholars such as Karl Lachmann and Gregor Wilhelm Nitzsch proposed that the Iliad was a composite of originally unrelated poems that had been combined and improved by Homer.
Correction

This misstates Gregor Wilhelm Nitzsch’s position. Nitzsch was a prominent opponent of the composite-poem theory and argued instead that the Iliad and Odyssey were unified creations of the same poet.

Full reasoning

Karl Lachmann did argue for a composite origin of the Iliad, but Gregor Wilhelm Nitzsch did not. An authoritative biographical entry in Deutsche Biographie describes Nitzsch as "Vertreter der Einheit der homer. Epen" (a proponent of the unity of the Homeric epics) and "einer der entschiedensten Gegner Friedrich August Wolfs". It further says that Nitzsch saw the Iliad and Odyssey as "nach festem künstlerischem Plan gestaltete Schöpfungen desselben Dichters"—works shaped according to a fixed artistic plan by the same poet.

So the sentence is inaccurate because it groups Nitzsch together with Lachmann as if both advanced the same composite-poem theory. In fact, Nitzsch is well known for arguing the opposite side in the Homeric Question.

2 sources
  • Deutsche Biographie - Nitzsch, Gregor Wilhelm

    "N. profilierte sich als Vertreter der Einheit der homer. Epen und als einer der entschiedensten Gegner Friedrich August Wolfs. Er sah in Ilias und Odyssee nach festem künstlerischem Plan gestaltete Schöpfungen desselben Dichters..."

  • The Homeric Question - The Cambridge Guide to Homer

    This essay addresses the so-called "Homeric Question" ... which dominated Homeric scholarship in the nineteenth century and was largely concerned with authorship and the relationship of the Iliad and Odyssey to other known Archaic epic poetry.

2
Claim
he became assistant professor of classics at the University of British Columbia.
Correction

Sources on MacKay’s career say he was appointed associate professor at UBC in 1941, not assistant professor. A 1945 official Guggenheim listing also identifies him as an associate professor at UBC.

Full reasoning

This claim conflicts with biographical sources on MacKay’s career.

  • The University of Toronto Archives’ authority record for MacKay says he was "Appointed Associate Professor of Classics at University of British Columbia in 1941".
  • An official archived Canadian government appendix listing Guggenheim fellowships identifies him in 1945 as "Louis Alexander MacKay, Associate Professor of Classics, University of British Columbia".

Because the article specifically says that in 1941 he became assistant professor at UBC, while these sources identify his 1941 appointment/rank as associate professor, the rank in the article is incorrect.

3 sources
Model: OPENAI_GPT_5 Prompt: v1.16.0