www.lesswrong.com/posts/gEETjfjm3eCkJKesz/why-i-transitioned-a-case-study

This expands the acronym incorrectly. In Blanchard’s framework, the two categories are homosexual transsexuals and autogynephilic/nonhomosexual transsexuals. A Northwestern page by J. Michael Bailey summarizing Blanchard’s work describes “the classic, homosexual type” and contrasts that with heterosexual, bisexual, and asexual transsexuals grouped as “nonhomosexual.” ContraPoints’ transcript likewise summarizes the first category as “the homosexual transsexuals.” So the post’s expansion of HSTS as “heterosexual transexuals” is factually wrong.

This sentence misstates who Blanchard placed in the autogynephilic/nonhomosexual category. Blanchard did not restrict that category to people who had previously lived as straight men. Summaries of his typology consistently state that the autogynephilic group included heterosexual, bisexual, and asexual/analloerotic males. Bailey’s summary of Blanchard says he grouped “heterosexual,” “bisexual,” and “asexual” transsexuals together as the “nonhomosexual” transsexuals. ContraPoints’ transcript similarly says Blanchard described autogynephiles as “straight, bi, or self-avowed asexual men.” So describing AGP trans women as having previously lived as straight men is too narrow and is inaccurate as a description of Blanchard’s typology.