All corrections
X March 2, 2026 at 08:14 AM

x.com/ciphergoth/status/2028218732854853739/photo/1

1 correction found

1
Claim
They also reserve the term “collecting” for the querying process
Correction

In U.S. intelligence/DoD rules, “collection” is defined as receiving/acquiring (and processing into intelligible form) information—not querying/searching an already-held database.

Full reasoning

The post claims the government (in this context, NSA/DoD intelligence components) uses “collecting” to mean querying databases.

However, publicly available U.S. government/IC-related materials define collection in the opposite direction: as receipt/acquisition of information.

1) DoD regulation defines “collected” as received (and processed), not queried

DoD 5240.1-R (the procedures governing DoD intelligence components that affect U.S. persons) states:

  • “Information shall be considered as ‘collected’ only when it has been received for use…”
  • “Data acquired by electronic means is ‘collected’ only when it has been processed into intelligible form.”

That definition is about receipt/acquisition/processing of information, not searching a database that already exists.

2) NSA-related legal standards report likewise ties “collection” to receipt/acceptance

A (publicly posted) report to Congress on legal standards for electronic surveillance explains that for NSA, DoDD 5240.1-R Procedure 2 defines collection to include “receipt or acceptance” of information (e.g., from a foreign government).

Again, this is describing receiving/accepting information—not querying.

Conclusion

Because these sources define “collection” as receiving/acquiring (and processing) information, the post’s specific claim that the term is reserved for querying is contradicted by the relevant published definitions and is therefore incorrect.

2 sources
Model: OPENAI_GPT_5 Prompt: v1.6.0