x.com/johnbuildss/status/2029481197131207142
1 correction found
they don’t even have a favicon…
Claude/Anthropic does have a favicon: both claude.ai/favicon.ico and anthropic.com/favicon.ico return valid icon files.
Full reasoning
The post asserts that the (implied) company behind Claude/Anthropic “don’t even have a favicon”. However, both the Claude product domain and Anthropic’s main site serve a favicon at the standard /favicon.ico path.
Direct verification (hard evidence):
- Requesting
https://claude.ai/favicon.icoreturns HTTP 200 withContent-Type: image/x-icon, meaning a favicon exists and is being served. - Requesting
https://www.anthropic.com/favicon.icoalso returns HTTP 200 withContent-Type: image/x-icon.
Context check:
A reply thread mirrored on Nitter indicates the discussion is about Google search display and even references claude.ai/favicon.ico; the author later acknowledges “they have one,” consistent with the direct HTTP evidence.
Because the favicon files are demonstrably present and served, the claim that they “don’t even have a favicon” is incorrect.
3 sources
- claude.ai favicon.ico
Direct request returns HTTP 200 with Content-Type: image/x-icon (a favicon file is served).
- Anthropic favicon.ico
Direct request returns HTTP 200 with Content-Type: image/x-icon (a favicon file is served).
- John (@johnbuildss): "$380 billion valuation, and they don’t even have a favicon…" | nitter.tiekoetter.com
Reply thread includes: “they have it , the probleme is google claude.ai/favicon.ico” and author response: “Yeah I know …” / “Yeah, I know they have one …”