x.com/BoringBiz_/status/2112333071898882297

The arithmetic in this sentence does not match the numbers it cites.

• The post's stated hourly rate is about $154/hour (and $500,000 ÷ 3,250 hours = 153.846..., which rounds to 154).
• But 300 hours × $154/hour = $46,200, not $38,000.
• If the author meant to use the prior assumption of 250 hours/year, then 250 × 154 = $38,500, which is roughly consistent with “$38K” — but that is not what the parenthetical says.

So the specific claim that the annual value is “$38K/yr (300 hours x his hourly rate of $154/hr)” is numerically incorrect as written.