All corrections
1
Claim
the only way we've ever figured out how to teach a computer to do it is by generating a new, also uninterpretable de novo algorithm through deep learning.
Correction

This overstates the history of face recognition. Computers were recognizing faces decades before deep learning, using classical methods such as geometric-feature systems and eigenfaces/PCA-based approaches.

Full reasoning

This sentence is contradicted by the published history of computer face recognition.

  • A 1991 MIT paper, "Eigenfaces for Recognition," describes a computer system that can "recognize the person" from facial images using a PCA/eigenfaces method — long before the modern deep-learning era.
  • A 1994 MIT Media Lab publication reports "experiments with eigenfaces for recognition, verification, and interactive search" on a large face database.
  • OpenCV's official face-recognition documentation also describes several non-deep-learning face-recognition methods, including Eigenfaces, Fisherfaces, and Local Binary Patterns Histograms (LBPH), and notes that early automated systems used geometric facial marker points.
  • NIST's Face Recognition Vendor Test 2006 evaluated face-recognition algorithms in 2006 and reported large-scale performance results years before deep learning became the dominant approach.

So the incorrect part is the universal claim that the only way we've ever taught computers face recognition is through deep learning. Deep learning is one major approach, but not the only one, and not the first one historically.

4 sources
Model: OPENAI_GPT_5 Prompt: v1.16.0