zh-classical.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E8%BE%A8%E8%AC%AC
3 corrections found
亞里士多德纂《具器大典》之一篇也
這句把《具器大典》（Organon）說成亞里士多德自己編成的一部書，並把《辨謬》說成其中單純一篇，這不準確。"Organon"是後世註家給亞里士多德邏輯著作群的總稱；《辨謬》通常被算作其中一部著作，且常被視為《論題篇》的末段或附錄。
Full reasoning
可靠哲學參考資料都指出，"Organon"並不是亞里士多德自己編定、命名的一部書。斯坦福哲學百科〈Aristotle's Logic〉說，古代註家才把亞里士多德若干論著合編在 Organon 這個題名之下，且亞里士多德本人從不使用這個名稱；同條目又明說 On Sophistical Refutations（即《辨謬》）是 Topics（《論題篇》）的末段或附錄。斯坦福哲學百科另一條〈The Textual Transmission of the Aristotelian Corpus〉更直接說，亞里士多德肯定不是以這個標題把這些論著編成一組。
因此，把《辨謬》寫成「亞里士多德纂《具器大典》之一篇」會讓讀者誤以為：
- 《具器大典》是亞里士多德親自編成並命名的單一著作；以及
- 《辨謬》只是其中普通一篇。
較準確的說法應是：《辨謬》是亞里士多德的一部邏輯論著；後世註家把它與其他邏輯著作合稱為《Organon》；它又常被視為《論題篇》的附錄或終篇。
3 sources
- Aristotle's Logic (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Spring 2015 Edition)
The ancient commentators grouped together several of Aristotle's treatises under the title Organon ... Aristotle himself never uses this term ... On Sophistical Refutations is a final section, or an appendix, to the Topics.
- The Textual Transmission of the Aristotelian Corpus (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
Aristotle is certainly not responsible for grouping these treatises in this way under this label.
- Aristotle: Logic | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Ancient commentators regarded logic as a widely-applicable instrument or method for careful thinking. They grouped Aristotle's six logical treatises into a sort of manual they called the Organon.
分全之謬（曰：「人命不過百歲，國，國人也，故國命不過百歲。」此言謬矣。）
這條把亞里士多德《辨謬》中第三類語言謬誤說成「由部分推整體」的謬誤，不準確。亞里士多德原文這一類講的是詞語的「合讀／連讀」造成的歧義，不是現代常說的部分—整體推論錯誤。
Full reasoning
《辨謬》原文把依賴語言的六類謬誤列為：ambiguity, amphiboly, combination, division of words, accent, form of expression。其中第三類是 combination，說的是把詞語連在一起讀時產生歧義。亞里士多德在原文給的例子是："A man can walk while sitting, and can write while not writing"，並解釋關鍵在於把詞分開讀或連起來讀，意思不同。
因此，這裡把第三類寫成「分全之謬」，再用「人命不過百歲，國，國人也，故國命不過百歲」來解釋，就把亞里士多德這一條從語詞結合的歧義改寫成了部分與整體之間的不當推論。這是另一種後來常見的「composition」謬誤用法，不是《辨謬》此處原來所列的那一類。
2 sources
- On Sophistical Refutations by Aristotle
Those ways of producing the false appearance of an argument which depend on language are six in number: they are ambiguity, amphiboly, combination, division of words, accent, form of expression... Upon the combination of words there depend instances such as the following: 'A man can walk while sitting, and can write while not writing'.
- Fallacies (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Summer 2024 Edition)
The first group ... includes those Aristotle considers dependent on language (in dictione) ... The fallacies dependent on language are equivocation, amphiboly, combination of words, division of words, accent and form of expression.
全分之謬（曰：「楚人善泳，子乃楚人，故子亦善泳。」此言謬矣。）
這條把亞里士多德《辨謬》中第四類語言謬誤說成「由整體推部分」的謬誤，也不準確。亞里士多德原文第四類講的是詞語的「拆讀／分讀」造成的歧義，不是現代常說的整體—部分推論錯誤。
Full reasoning
在《辨謬》列出的六種「依賴語言」的謬誤中，第四類是 division of words，也就是把本應連讀的詞語拆開讀而產生歧義。亞里士多德原文緊接著第三類 combination 之後，明確說第四類是 division of words，並舉出像「5 is 2 and 3, and odd」這類例子，說明問題在於同一句話分開讀與連著讀，意義不同。
因此，本文把第四類寫成「全分之謬」，再用「楚人善泳，子乃楚人，故子亦善泳」來說明，就把亞里士多德原本的詞語分讀歧義，改成了後世常說的由整體性質推出個別部分性質的推論錯誤。這不是《辨謬》這一條原先所指的內容。
2 sources
- On Sophistical Refutations by Aristotle
Those ways of producing the false appearance of an argument which depend on language are six in number: they are ambiguity, amphiboly, combination, division of words, accent, form of expression... Upon division depend the propositions that 5 is 2 and 3, and odd, and that the greater is equal.
- Fallacies (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Summer 2024 Edition)
The fallacies dependent on language are equivocation, amphiboly, combination of words, division of words, accent and form of expression.