All corrections
Substack October 10, 2026 at 08:27 PM

ramblingafter.substack.com/p/the-killer-threat-of-ais-that-over

1 correction found

1
Claim
the aircraft was not equipped with either a radio altimeter nor a ground proximity warning system, forcing the pilot to navigate instead by GPS coordinates.
Correction

This overstates what those missing systems do. A radio altimeter and GPWS are terrain/height warning aids, not primary navigation systems, and the crash report says the aircraft was otherwise properly instrument-equipped.

Full reasoning

The Transportation Safety Board of Canada report does not say the pilot was forced to navigate by GPS because the aircraft lacked a radio altimeter and GPWS.

Instead, the report says:

  • the aircraft was "certified, equipped and maintained" and "had the instrumentation required for instrument flight";
  • it was equipped with a GPS;
  • it was not equipped with a radio altimeter or GPWS;
  • those missing devices could have warned the pilot that the aircraft was dangerously close to terrain.

That matters because a radio altimeter measures height above the terrain beneath the aircraft, and GPWS/TAWS provides terrain warnings. They are safety/alerting systems, not the thing that normally replaces all other navigation.

The TSB’s causal discussion is narrower: the pilot evidently used the GPS, and the waypoint for the crater was entered incorrectly by 2.5 nautical miles, which may have contributed to loss of situational awareness in poor visibility. But that is different from saying the lack of GPWS or a radio altimeter forced GPS navigation.

So the article incorrectly describes the function of those systems and overstates their relationship to the pilot’s use of GPS.

3 sources
Model: OPENAI_GPT_5 Prompt: v1.16.0