en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L.A._Confidential_(film)
2 corrections found
with 162 out of 163 reviews being positive.
This Rotten Tomatoes review-count claim is outdated: Rotten Tomatoes currently lists 165 critic reviews for the film, not 163.
Full reasoning
The current Rotten Tomatoes page for L.A. Confidential shows "99% Tomatometer" based on "165 Reviews". That directly contradicts the article's claim that the score is based on 163 reviews, with 162 positive. In other words, the review-count portion of this sentence is no longer accurate on Rotten Tomatoes' own page.
1 source
- L.A. Confidential | Rotten Tomatoes
L.A. Confidential ... 99% Tomatometer 165 Reviews 94% Popcornmeter 100,000+ Ratings
John Seale
This awards-table entry is wrong: the 1997 Boston Society of Film Critics Best Film winner was L.A. Confidential, not John Seale.
Full reasoning
The official Boston Society of Film Critics archive lists the 1997 Best Film winner as "L.A. Confidential". The same archive lists John Seale separately as the 1996 Best Cinematography winner for The English Patient. So placing John Seale in the 1997 Best Film row is incorrect.
1 source
- BSFC Winners 1990s - Boston Society of Film Critics
1997 (Dec. 14) Best Film - L.A. Confidential ... 1996 (Dec. 13) Best Cinematography - John Seale (I) for The English Patient